Subscribe to the blog
Here's something frustrating. Most ML teams have the same problem: they can't get the data they actually need. Sometimes it's locked behind privacy laws. Other times it simply doesn't exist yet. Think about training a fraud detection model when you haven't seen every type of fraud. Or building a medical diagnosis tool when rare diseases only appear in a handful of patient records. The synthetic data market hit $280 million in 2023 and is growing at 38% annually for exactly this reason. People need data that's safe, scalable, and covers edge cases that real datasets can't provide.
Synthetic data is artificially generated information that mimics real data without containing actual observations from it. It's not a copy or a masked version.
It's a simulation that preserves statistical patterns while leaving no trail back to real people or events. This blog walks through what synthetic data actually is, why teams depend on it, how to create and evaluate it properly, and how to use it without making things worse. For dedicated learners ready to transform their practice, ATC's Generative AI Masterclass is a hybrid, hands-on, 10-session (20-hour) program that teaches no-code generative tools, AI for voice and vision, and working with multiple agents using semi-Superintendent Design, culminating in a capstone where participants deploy an operational AI agent.
What is synthetic data?
Synthetic data is artificially created information designed to mirror the structure and statistical characteristics of real-world data without containing any actual records from the original dataset. The distributions look right. The correlations hold. Edge cases show up. But no real person, transaction, or event appears in the data. This makes it different from data augmentation, which just transforms existing samples like rotating an image. It's also not the same as anonymization, which masks identifiers but can still leak information through patterns.
You'll find synthetic data in several forms. Tabular synthetic data replicates database rows and columns for customer records, financial transactions, or sensor logs.
Image synthetic data generates visual content for computer vision, especially useful in medical scans or street scenes for self-driving cars. Audio and voice synthetic data creates speech samples for training voice assistants in underrepresented languages. Text synthetic data produces natural language when real text is scarce or protected by copyright. Each type solves a different problem, but they all unlock learning opportunities that real data can't safely or cheaply provide.
Why do we need synthetic data
Data scarcity isn't really about volume. It's about access, quality, and coverage. Privacy regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA restrict how organizations collect and use personal data.
Even synthetic data needs careful handling to meet GDPR standards, since poorly generated datasets can still leak information. Labeling costs add up fast, sometimes reaching tens of thousands of dollars for specialized domains like medical imaging. Then there's the long-tail problem. Fraud patterns, rare diseases, adverse drug reactions, and unusual driving scenarios make up a tiny fraction of observations but represent the cases models most need to handle correctly.
Real-world examples show the impact. Healthcare organizations struggle to develop AI for rare diseases without violating patient privacy. Financial institutions can't train fraud detection on attack vectors they haven't encountered yet.
Autonomous vehicle teams need millions of miles in rain, fog, and snow but can't safely log them at scale. Voice assistants fail for non-native speakers because training data skews toward dominant accents. Gartner forecasts that by 2030, synthetic data will be more widely used than real-world datasets, reflecting these mounting pressures.
How synthetic data is generated
The techniques vary widely depending on data type and use case. For images and complex data, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are popular. Picture a forger and a detective in a game. The generator network creates fake data while the discriminator tries to spot fakes.
As training progresses, both get better, eventually producing synthetic images nearly indistinguishable from real ones. GANs deliver impressive visual quality but can be tricky to train. They're prone to mode collapse, where the generator only produces a narrow range of outputs.
Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) take a different route. The encoder compresses real data into a compact summary. The decoder reconstructs data from that compressed form. Once trained, you sample new points to generate fresh examples.
VAEs tend to be more stable than GANs but produce slightly blurrier images. They work well for tabular data and situations needing smooth transitions between examples.
Diffusion models have surged recently, powering tools like DALL-E and Stable Diffusion. These models learn to reverse a gradual noising process, refining random noise into coherent data. They deliver exceptional realism but cost more computationally.
For tabular data with class imbalance, SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique) offers a simpler solution.
SMOTE generates new minority-class examples by drawing lines between existing samples and their nearest neighbors, then placing synthetic points along those lines. It's lightweight and doesn't require deep learning infrastructure, though it works best when classes are reasonably separated.
Beyond machine learning, rule-based generators and simulators create synthetic data by encoding domain knowledge directly. Physics engines generate sensor data for robotics. Financial models simulate transaction streams. These methods offer full control but require significant expertise to build.
Measuring quality and evaluating success
Generating synthetic data is only half the work. You need to know if it's good.
Quality assessment revolves around three dimensions: fidelity (does it statistically resemble real data?), utility (does it improve model performance?), and privacy (does it leak sensitive information?).
For fidelity, check that means, medians, standard deviations, and category distributions align between real and synthetic datasets. Correlation matrices should match. For images, metrics like Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) quantify how closely generated images resemble real ones in feature space. Lower FID scores mean higher similarity.
But fidelity alone doesn't guarantee success. What matters most is utility.
Does your model perform better when trained on synthetic data? Design experiments with a holdout real-world test set the generator never sees. Compare model performance when trained on real data alone versus real plus synthetic.
Privacy evaluation needs scrutiny too. Run membership inference tests to check whether adversaries can determine if a specific real record was in the training set.
Assess vulnerability scores that quantify re-identification risk. The takeaway here is that evaluation isn't a checkbox. It's an iterative process balancing realism, usefulness, and safety.
Risks, pitfalls, and governance
Synthetic data isn't a silver bullet, but used right, it unlocks data you otherwise can't collect. That said, risks exist when governance is weak.
Bias amplification is a major concern. If your real data contains historical biases, generative models can inherit and magnify them. A GAN trained on biased hiring data may produce synthetic resumes that reinforce discriminatory patterns. Always audit both source data and synthetic output for fairness.
Synthetic datasets can introduce artifacts: patterns that don't exist in the real world, like unrealistic lighting in images or impossible value combinations in tables. Models trained on these artifacts may fail in production. Another pitfall is overfitting to synthetic data. If your model sees only generated examples, it may learn the quirks of the generator rather than the true distribution.
Hybrid training typically yields better generalization.Then there's model collapse, when generative models train on outputs from other generative models and quality degrades over time. Legal landscapes are still catching up. Using synthetic data improperly can still trigger violations. Establish clear data provenance systems that track when, how, and why synthetic data was introduced. Document methods, test for bias, maintain audit trails, and treat synthetic data as a complement to real-world labels, not a replacement.
When and how to adopt synthetic data
Start with problem scoping. Identify specific pain points where data scarcity, privacy, or cost blocks progress.
Are you missing labeled examples for rare events? Do regulations prevent data sharing? Synthetic data shines when real data is inaccessible or insufficient.
Next, conduct a data audit. Assess the quality, volume, and coverage of existing data. If your real data is severely biased or incomplete, synthetic augmentation might amplify those issues. Clean and curate your seed data first.
Then choose your method based on data type. For tabular data, consider SMOTE for class imbalance or VAE/GAN-based generators for richer distributions. For images, evaluate GAN architectures or diffusion models.
Specialized platforms like Gretel, MOSTLY AI, K2view, or YData offer end-to-end pipelines with privacy safeguards and quality metrics built in.
If you prefer guided, practical learning, consider ATC's Generative AI Masterclass. It's a hybrid, hands-on, 10-session (20-hour) program that covers no-code generative tools, voice and vision applications, and multi-agent workflows using semi-Superintendent Design. Graduates receive an AI Generalist Certification and can design and deploy AI-powered workflows.
Run a pilot project on a well-defined, low-stakes use case. Generate a modest synthetic dataset, train a baseline model on real data and a comparison model on real plus synthetic, then evaluate on held-out real test data. Measure downstream task performance, not just fidelity metrics. If results are promising, gradually scale and integrate synthetic data into production pipelines, monitoring for drift and artifacts over time.
Short case example
A regional hospital network wanted to predict patient readmission risk within 30 days of discharge. The challenge is that they had only 400 labeled examples of readmitted patients versus 12,000 non-readmitted cases, creating severe class imbalance. Privacy regulations prohibited sharing patient data externally.
The team applied a VAE-based synthetic data generator to create 1,200 realistic synthetic readmission cases, preserving correlations between age, diagnosis codes, medication lists, and prior visit history. They trained an XGBoost classifier on the hybrid dataset and compared it against a baseline trained on imbalanced real data alone. The hybrid model improved recall on the minority readmission class by 18 percentage points while maintaining acceptable precision, unlocking earlier intervention for at-risk patients. The team validated the synthetic data through privacy audits and clinical review to ensure medical plausibility.
Conclusion
Synthetic data has moved from experimental curiosity to operational necessity for teams building AI in privacy-conscious, data-hungry environments. It won't replace real-world data. Nothing beats ground truth for final validation. But it fills critical gaps, accelerates development, and democratizes access to datasets that were previously out of reach. The key is treating synthetic data generation as an engineering discipline. Choose methods carefully, evaluate rigorously across fidelity, utility, and privacy, and govern transparently to avoid amplifying bias or leaking information. Start small, iterate, and build confidence before scaling. Organizations that learn to wield synthetic data responsibly will train better models, faster, and more safely than competitors still waiting for permission to access real data.
Reservations are open for the ATC Generative AI Masterclass, currently 12 of 25 spots remaining. Graduates receive an AI Generalist Certification and the practical experience to turn synthetic-data ideas into operational systems. Reserve your spot to start reimagining how your organization scales AI.
