User acceptance testing is the final stop on the way to software release.
Who do you work for?
Hint: It isn’t your company.
No, the person you work for is, above all else, the customer.
So when you’re testing the software the customer has commissioned you to create, you better make sure it works like it’s intended. . Because there are many types of software testing. And they all perform different functions.
In this post, we will discuss user acceptance testing, sometimes called beta testing or end-user testing. It’s the kind of test that puts the customer front and center. We’ll show you what it is, why it matters, the various user acceptance testing methods, and much more.
Let’s get into it.
Before we can define user acceptance testing (UAT), we have to define its individual parts.
The “user” is either the client who hired you to build them a software product or the consumer you’ll be selling to. And “acceptance” means agreement or approval.
Software testing is, therefore, performed by the user or client to establish whether it’s approved for release or not. UAT is typically the very last test a software undergoes after integration testing, end-to-end testing, and every other form of testing.
When you perform functional tests (which are usually undertaken by quality assurance engineers), you validate the software against functional specs. These are specifications that no one outside of developers fully understands or cares about.
But just because the software functions properly doesn’t mean it will be well-received or enjoyed by its intended audience.
Certain business requirements and processes are only understood by clients or users. That’s why user acceptance testing is so important. Developers tend to develop tunnel vision when working on the same app for long periods of time and can’t evaluate and assess everything, especially the front-end.
The other issue UAT solves is post-release bugs, errors, or bad user experience. These bugs may not show up in other tests but they may become apparent in the app design or flow of features.
Fixing these before the software is released will reduce initial negative impressions or reviews of your software.
There is a specific process all software go through in user acceptance testing.
Different DevOps teams will have slightly different processes, but we’ll give you a general 5-step process that most teams loosely follow.
The 5 steps are:
Let’s dig into each one at a time.
The first step in the user acceptance testing process is planning.
First, establish your UAT schedule and the QA agents and testers you’re going to need for the duration of the project. A helpful exercise is to draft a concept of what your testing group should look like and work off of that.
Then sit down and decide who exactly will be involved in the execution of UAT, including their roles and responsibilities.
Once that’s done, bring your UAT team together. Make sure everyone understands their responsibilities. Establish clear communication guidelines. And prep them for testing.
During the UAT process it’s important to follow a specific workflow so you can effectively manage bugs, errors, and other defects or problems.
So ahead of time, settle on how you’re going to document problems and how testers will communicate the problems you want documented.
There are a variety of ways you can handle the execution of UAT. One way is to bring the testers to your facility and have them perform the testing there. However, if you’re selling the software to end users around the globe, then you probably won’t be able to meet your testers in person.
In that case, conduct one-on-one sessions with them via Skype or Zoom or some other online telecom software. This will give you tons of quantitative and qualitative data from users.
You’ll discover insights that you’ve never considered, you’ll gain a better understanding of how savvy your end user is already, and you’ll be better positioned to change or tweak all the necessary aspects of your software to make it excellent.
While executing UAT, you should also be documenting your progress. Make sure whatever you use allows you to record bugs, user feedback, abnormalities, and any other significant observations.
And keep in mind the objectives of UAT when documenting progress:
It’s at this phase you need to evaluate whether or not the criteria has been tested and met.
This is the most extensive phase of UAT because you’re collecting, aggregating, and analyzing data.
You should strive to answer the following questions:
The reason these questions need to be answered is because it gives you context for the results of the tests. That context tells you how your real end users will interact with and experience your software in a variety of mental and emotional states.
This is the phase where you evaluate the bigger picture of UAT. The lessons learned and insights gained. It’s this data, after everything is said and done, that allows you to improve future test cases and optimize your UAT workflow.
A typical UAT team consists of a business program manager, UAT test manager, and UAT test team.
We’ll cover each one below.
The business program manager is responsible for reviewing and approving the UAT test strategy and plan. They’re also accountable for ensuring that the UAT process is completed on schedule and on budget. They also monitor the progress of the project and work side-by-side with business operations.
The UAT test manager will actually formulate the UAT strategy and plan. They’ll also review and approve test scenarios, test cases, and deliver weekly status reports.
And if you’re using a new or improved workflow, they’re in charge of driving metrics collection to measure the benefits of the testing methods, tools, and environment.
The UAT test team prepares and executes the UAT test plan, including test scenarios, test cases, and test data. It’s their responsibility to verify and validate business if requirements are being met and defects are being reported. They also create test logs and test summaries.
You may be confused about the difference between system testing vs user acceptance testing.
We’ll clear up your confusion by walking through the exact differences below.
System Testing | User Acceptance Testing |
Used to check if the software meets business requirements. | Used to check if the software meets user requirements, user story, user needs. |
Performed by developers and testers. | Performed by independent testers, end users, stakeholders, and/or clients. |
Incorporates functional and non-functional testing. | Is purely functional. |
Tests how the software performs as a whole. | Tests the usefulness and usability of the software. |
Performed with demo data. | Performed with real-time, production data. |
Comprises system testing and integration testing. | Comprises alpha and beta testing. |
Performed before acceptance testing. | Performed after system testing. |
Involves performance, load, and stress testing. | Involves value analysis, equivalence partitioning, and decision table testing. |
Contains more negative test cases. | Contains more positive test cases. |
Defects found can be fixed based on priorities. | Defects found are taken as the failure of the software product. |
Tests the software for possible dummy inputs. | Tests the software for random inputs. |
User Acceptance Testing Methods
Now that you know what acceptance testing is and what it’s not, let’s take a look at the various types of UAT tests you can run.
We’ll dive into the following:
Alpha testing is performed to find all the possible bugs and errors in your software before you release it publicly.
The purpose is to simulate real users, so testers are tasked with carrying out normal tasks that regular users will be doing. These tests are typically conducted in a lab environment by the development team.
Beta testing is performed by real, regular people. Actual end users of the software in a “real environment” – meaning, outside of a lab in the environment(s) the software would be used normally if it was commercially available.
A limited number of users will be allowed to access and use the software for a specified period of time. You’ll gain valuable feedback from them about the product’s quality and functionality.
The purpose of beta testing is to reduce risks of failure and provide a high quality product through customer validation. This is pretty much the final test before releasing the software.
Contract acceptance testing is when software is tested against particular specifications and criteria agreed upon in your contract. The development team defines the criteria for acceptance for the contract itself to establish the specs they’ll need to meet in the final product.
Regulation acceptance testing, otherwise known as compliance acceptance testing, examines the software to make sure it complies with regulations governing your industry.
Operational acceptance testing, also known as production acceptance testing, helps ensure that workflows are in place to allow software to be used effectively.
This includes backup plans, user training, maintenance processes, security checks, and so on.
Here are the best practices for conducting a successful UAT:
You know you need to run user acceptance tests. But it’s not as simple as just running the tests we just covered.
If you don’t have the right people running the tests, you won’t get the best results. Finding and hiring the right in-house developers and testers is a headache (and cost) that you probably don’t want to deal with.
And you don’t have to. We can manage your testing for you.
But first, fulfilling certain prerequisites to user acceptance testing would ensure an ultimately successful test. These prerequisites are as follows:
With our managed testing services, you get:
Plus, we can handle the “big 6” of testing:
On top of handling user acceptance testing.
Reach out today for reliable and effective software testing management.
In today's challenging job market, marked by layoffs, budget cuts, and recession fears, workers under…
The introduction of the Hybrid Cloud in 2011 revolutionized global businesses that solely depended on…
SaaS companies typically operate on a subscription model, which makes their sales cycle more intricate…
For years, companies across industries have been adopting Agile approaches for greater adaptability and speed.…
The race to become future-ready is critical as organizations stand to gain 1.7x higher efficiency…
Having a worldwide adoption of 87 percent, Scrum has unlocked a powerful way for companies…
This website uses cookies.